Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species?

Butlin RK, Servedio MR, Smadja CM, Bank C, Barton NH, Flaxman SM, Giraud T, Hopkins R, Larson EL, Maan ME, Meier J, Merrill R, Noor MAF, Ortiz‐Barrientos D, Qvarnström A. 2021. Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species? Evolution., evo. 14235.


Journal Article | Epub ahead of print | English
Author
Butlin, Roger K.; Servedio, Maria R.; Smadja, Carole M.; Bank, Claudia; Barton, Nick HIST Austria ; Flaxman, Samuel M.; Giraud, Tatiana; Hopkins, Robin; Larson, Erica L.; Maan, Martine E.; Meier, Joana; Merrill, Richard
All
Department
Abstract
If there are no constraints on the process of speciation, then the number of species might be expected to match the number of available niches and this number might be indefinitely large. One possible constraint is the opportunity for allopatric divergence. In 1981, Felsenstein used a simple and elegant model to ask if there might also be genetic constraints. He showed that progress towards speciation could be described by the build‐up of linkage disequilibrium among divergently selected loci and between these loci and those contributing to other forms of reproductive isolation. Therefore, speciation is opposed by recombination, because it tends to break down linkage disequilibria. Felsenstein then introduced a crucial distinction between “two‐allele” models, which are subject to this effect, and “one‐allele” models, which are free from the recombination constraint. These fundamentally important insights have been the foundation for both empirical and theoretical studies of speciation ever since.
Publishing Year
Date Published
2021-04-19
Journal Title
Evolution
Acknowledgement
RKB was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NE/P012272/1 & NE/P001610/1), the European Research Council (693030 BARRIERS), and the Swedish Research Council (VR) (2018‐03695). MRS was funded by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. DEB1939290).
Article Number
evo.14235
IST-REx-ID

Cite this

Butlin RK, Servedio MR, Smadja CM, et al. Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species? Evolution. 2021. doi:10.1111/evo.14235
Butlin, R. K., Servedio, M. R., Smadja, C. M., Bank, C., Barton, N. H., Flaxman, S. M., … Qvarnström, A. (2021). Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species? Evolution. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14235
Butlin, Roger K., Maria R. Servedio, Carole M. Smadja, Claudia Bank, Nicholas H Barton, Samuel M. Flaxman, Tatiana Giraud, et al. “Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or Why Are There so Few/Many Species?” Evolution. Wiley, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14235.
R. K. Butlin et al., “Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species?,” Evolution. Wiley, 2021.
Butlin RK, Servedio MR, Smadja CM, Bank C, Barton NH, Flaxman SM, Giraud T, Hopkins R, Larson EL, Maan ME, Meier J, Merrill R, Noor MAF, Ortiz‐Barrientos D, Qvarnström A. 2021. Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or why are there so few/many species? Evolution., evo. 14235.
Butlin, Roger K., et al. “Homage to Felsenstein 1981, or Why Are There so Few/Many Species?” Evolution, evo. 14235, Wiley, 2021, doi:10.1111/evo.14235.
All files available under the following license(s):
Copyright Statement:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. [...]

Link(s) to Main File(s)
Access Level
OA Open Access

Export

Marked Publications

Open Data IST Research Explorer

Search this title in

Google Scholar