{"day":"12","publisher":"Springer","department":[{"_id":"DaAl"}],"isi":1,"user_id":"c635000d-4b10-11ee-a964-aac5a93f6ac1","article_processing_charge":"Yes (via OA deal)","file":[{"date_created":"2018-12-17T14:21:22Z","access_level":"open_access","checksum":"872db70bba9b401500abe3c6ae2f1a61","file_id":"5711","creator":"dernst","file_name":"2018_DistributedComputing_Lenzen.pdf","content_type":"application/pdf","date_updated":"2020-07-14T12:48:01Z","relation":"main_file","file_size":799337}],"publication_status":"published","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication":"Distributed Computing","_id":"76","scopus_import":"1","oa":1,"abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"Consider a fully-connected synchronous distributed system consisting of n nodes, where up to f nodes may be faulty and every node starts in an arbitrary initial state. In the synchronous C-counting problem, all nodes need to eventually agree on a counter that is increased by one modulo C in each round for given C>1. In the self-stabilising firing squad problem, the task is to eventually guarantee that all non-faulty nodes have simultaneous responses to external inputs: if a subset of the correct nodes receive an external “go” signal as input, then all correct nodes should agree on a round (in the not-too-distant future) in which to jointly output a “fire” signal. Moreover, no node should generate a “fire” signal without some correct node having previously received a “go” signal as input. We present a framework reducing both tasks to binary consensus at very small cost. For example, we obtain a deterministic algorithm for self-stabilising Byzantine firing squads with optimal resilience f<n/3, asymptotically optimal stabilisation and response time O(f), and message size O(log f). As our framework does not restrict the type of consensus routines used, we also obtain efficient randomised solutions."}],"file_date_updated":"2020-07-14T12:48:01Z","date_created":"2018-12-11T11:44:30Z","month":"09","year":"2018","tmp":{"name":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0)","image":"/images/cc_by.png","short":"CC BY (4.0)","legal_code_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode"},"date_published":"2018-09-12T00:00:00Z","citation":{"short":"C. Lenzen, J. Rybicki, Distributed Computing (2018).","mla":"Lenzen, Christoph, and Joel Rybicki. “Near-Optimal Self-Stabilising Counting and Firing Squads.” Distributed Computing, Springer, 2018, doi:10.1007/s00446-018-0342-6.","ama":"Lenzen C, Rybicki J. Near-optimal self-stabilising counting and firing squads. Distributed Computing. 2018. doi:10.1007/s00446-018-0342-6","ieee":"C. Lenzen and J. Rybicki, “Near-optimal self-stabilising counting and firing squads,” Distributed Computing. Springer, 2018.","chicago":"Lenzen, Christoph, and Joel Rybicki. “Near-Optimal Self-Stabilising Counting and Firing Squads.” Distributed Computing. Springer, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-018-0342-6.","apa":"Lenzen, C., & Rybicki, J. (2018). Near-optimal self-stabilising counting and firing squads. Distributed Computing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-018-0342-6","ista":"Lenzen C, Rybicki J. 2018. Near-optimal self-stabilising counting and firing squads. Distributed Computing."},"quality_controlled":"1","title":"Near-optimal self-stabilising counting and firing squads","project":[{"_id":"B67AFEDC-15C9-11EA-A837-991A96BB2854","name":"IST Austria Open Access Fund"}],"ddc":["000"],"doi":"10.1007/s00446-018-0342-6","has_accepted_license":"1","type":"journal_article","oa_version":"Published Version","publist_id":"7978","date_updated":"2023-09-13T09:01:06Z","status":"public","external_id":{"isi":["000475627800005"]},"author":[{"first_name":"Christoph","last_name":"Lenzen","full_name":"Lenzen, Christoph"},{"last_name":"Rybicki","first_name":"Joel","orcid":"0000-0002-6432-6646","id":"334EFD2E-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","full_name":"Rybicki, Joel"}]}