{"page":"18","day":"22","year":"2014","_id":"5418","doi":"10.15479/AT:IST-2014-176-v1-1","alternative_title":["IST Austria Technical Report"],"file_date_updated":"2020-07-14T12:46:49Z","pubrep_id":"176","publication_identifier":{"issn":["2664-1690"]},"author":[{"full_name":"Chatterjee, Krishnendu","orcid":"0000-0002-4561-241X","id":"2E5DCA20-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","last_name":"Chatterjee","first_name":"Krishnendu"},{"last_name":"Doyen","first_name":"Laurent","full_name":"Doyen, Laurent"}],"date_created":"2018-12-12T11:39:13Z","date_updated":"2023-02-23T10:30:58Z","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"has_accepted_license":"1","user_id":"2DF688A6-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","title":"Games with a weak adversary","related_material":{"record":[{"relation":"later_version","status":"public","id":"2163"}]},"department":[{"_id":"KrCh"}],"oa":1,"status":"public","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"We consider multi-player graph games with partial-observation and parity objective. While the decision problem for three-player games with a coalition of the first and second players against the third player is undecidable, we present a decidability result for partial-observation games where the first and third player are in a coalition against the second player, thus where the second player is adversarial but weaker due to partial-observation. We establish tight complexity bounds in the case where player 1 is less informed than player 2, namely 2-EXPTIME-completeness for parity objectives. The symmetric case of player 1 more informed than player 2 is much more complicated, and we show that already in the case where player 1 has perfect observation, memory of size non-elementary is necessary in general for reachability objectives, and the problem is decidable for safety and reachability objectives. Our results have tight connections with partial-observation stochastic games for which we derive new complexity results."}],"oa_version":"Published Version","date_published":"2014-03-22T00:00:00Z","type":"technical_report","publication_status":"published","file":[{"file_id":"5468","access_level":"open_access","file_size":328253,"date_created":"2018-12-12T11:53:07Z","date_updated":"2020-07-14T12:46:49Z","checksum":"1d6958aa60050e1c3e932c6e5f34c39f","creator":"system","file_name":"IST-2014-176-v1+1_icalp_14.pdf","relation":"main_file","content_type":"application/pdf"}],"ddc":["000","005"],"month":"03","citation":{"apa":"Chatterjee, K., & Doyen, L. (2014). Games with a weak adversary. IST Austria. https://doi.org/10.15479/AT:IST-2014-176-v1-1","ama":"Chatterjee K, Doyen L. Games with a Weak Adversary. IST Austria; 2014. doi:10.15479/AT:IST-2014-176-v1-1","chicago":"Chatterjee, Krishnendu, and Laurent Doyen. Games with a Weak Adversary. IST Austria, 2014. https://doi.org/10.15479/AT:IST-2014-176-v1-1.","short":"K. Chatterjee, L. Doyen, Games with a Weak Adversary, IST Austria, 2014.","ieee":"K. Chatterjee and L. Doyen, Games with a weak adversary. IST Austria, 2014.","ista":"Chatterjee K, Doyen L. 2014. Games with a weak adversary, IST Austria, 18p.","mla":"Chatterjee, Krishnendu, and Laurent Doyen. Games with a Weak Adversary. IST Austria, 2014, doi:10.15479/AT:IST-2014-176-v1-1."},"publisher":"IST Austria"}