Henzinger, Thomas AIST Austria ; Kupferman, Orna; Qadeer,Shaz
Symbolic model checking, which enables the automatic verification of large systems, proceeds by calculating with expressions that represent state sets. Traditionally, symbolic model-checking tools arc based on backward state traversal; their basic operation is the function pre, which given a set of states, returns the set of all predecessor states. This is because specifiers usally employ formalisms with future-time modalities. which are naturally evaluated by iterating applications of pre. It has been recently shown experimentally that symbolic model checking can perform significantly better if it is based, instead, on forward state traversal; in this case, the basic operation is the function post, which given a set of states, returns the set of all successor states. This is because forward state traversal can ensure that only those parts of the state space are explored which are reachable from an initial state and relevant for satisfaction or violation of the specification; that is, errors can be detected as soon as possible. In this paper, we investigate which specifications can be checked by symbolic forward state traversal. We formulate the problems of symbolic backward and forward model checking by means of two -calculi. The pre- calculus is based on the pre operation; the post- calculus, on the post operation. These two -calculi induce query logics, which augment fixpoint expressions with a boolean emptiness query. Using query logics, we are able to relate and compare the symbolic backward and forward approaches. In particular, we prove that all -regular (linear-time) specifications can be expressed as post- queries, and therefore checked using symbolic forward state traversal. On the other hand, we show that there are simple branching-time specifications that cannot be checked in this way.
This work is supported in part by ONR YIP award N00014-95-1-0520, by NSF CAREER award CCR-9501708, by NSF grant CCR-9504469, by ARO MURI grant DAAH-04-96-1-0341, and by the SRC contract 97-DC-324.041.
195 - 206
CAV: Computer Aided Verification
Henzinger TA, Kupferman O, Qadeer S. From pre-historic to post-modern symbolic model checking. In: Vol 1427. Springer; 1998:195-206. doi:10.1007/BFb0028745
Henzinger, T. A., Kupferman, O., & Qadeer, S. (1998). From pre-historic to post-modern symbolic model checking (Vol. 1427, pp. 195–206). Presented at the CAV: Computer Aided Verification, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028745
Henzinger, Thomas A, Orna Kupferman, and Shaz Qadeer. “From Pre-Historic to Post-Modern Symbolic Model Checking,” 1427:195–206. Springer, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028745.
T. A. Henzinger, O. Kupferman, and S. Qadeer, “From pre-historic to post-modern symbolic model checking,” presented at the CAV: Computer Aided Verification, 1998, vol. 1427, pp. 195–206.
Henzinger TA, Kupferman O, Qadeer S. 1998. From pre-historic to post-modern symbolic model checking. CAV: Computer Aided Verification, LNCS, vol. 1427. 195–206.
Henzinger, Thomas A., et al. From Pre-Historic to Post-Modern Symbolic Model Checking. Vol. 1427, Springer, 1998, pp. 195–206, doi:10.1007/BFb0028745.