More than 100 years after Grigg’s influential analysis of species’ borders, the causes of limits to species’ ranges still represent a puzzle that has never been understood with clarity. The topic has become especially important recently as many scientists have become interested in the potential for species’ ranges to shift in response to climate change—and yet nearly all of those studies fail to recognise or incorporate evolutionary genetics in a way that relates to theoretical developments. I show that range margins can be understood based on just two measurable parameters: (i) the fitness cost of dispersal—a measure of environmental heterogeneity—and (ii) the strength of genetic drift, which reduces genetic diversity. Together, these two parameters define an ‘expansion threshold’: adaptation fails when genetic drift reduces genetic diversity below that required for adaptation to a heterogeneous environment. When the key parameters drop below this expansion threshold locally, a sharp range margin forms. When they drop below this threshold throughout the species’ range, adaptation collapses everywhere, resulting in either extinction or formation of a fragmented metapopulation. Because the effects of dispersal differ fundamentally with dimension, the second parameter—the strength of genetic drift—is qualitatively different compared to a linear habitat. In two-dimensional habitats, genetic drift becomes effectively independent of selection. It decreases with ‘neighbourhood size’—the number of individuals accessible by dispersal within one generation. Moreover, in contrast to earlier predictions, which neglected evolution of genetic variance and/or stochasticity in two dimensions, dispersal into small marginal populations aids adaptation. This is because the reduction of both genetic and demographic stochasticity has a stronger effect than the cost of dispersal through increased maladaptation. The expansion threshold thus provides a novel, theoretically justified, and testable prediction for formation of the range margin and collapse of the species’ range.
Polechova J. Is the sky the limit? On the expansion threshold of a species’ range. PLoS Biology. 2018;16(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2005372
Polechova, J. (2018). Is the sky the limit? On the expansion threshold of a species’ range. PLoS Biology, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005372
Polechova, Jitka. “Is the Sky the Limit? On the Expansion Threshold of a Species’ Range.” PLoS Biology 16, no. 6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005372.
J. Polechova, “Is the sky the limit? On the expansion threshold of a species’ range,” PLoS Biology, vol. 16, no. 6, 2018.
Polechova J. 2018. Is the sky the limit? On the expansion threshold of a species’ range. PLoS Biology. 16(6).
Polechova, Jitka. “Is the Sky the Limit? On the Expansion Threshold of a Species’ Range.” PLoS Biology, vol. 16, no. 6, e2005372, Public Library of Science, 2018, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2005372.
All files available under the following license(s):
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
2017_PLOS_Polechova.pdf 6.97 MB