Systems should not only be correct but also robust in the sense that they behave reasonably in unexpected situations. This article addresses synthesis of robust reactive systems from temporal specifications. Existing methods allow arbitrary behavior if assumptions in the specification are violated. To overcome this, we define two robustness notions, combine them, and show how to enforce them in synthesis. The first notion applies to safety properties: If safety assumptions are violated temporarily, we require that the system recovers to normal operation with as few errors as possible. The second notion requires that, if liveness assumptions are violated, as many guarantees as possible should be fulfilled nevertheless. We present a synthesis procedure achieving this for the important class of GR(1) specifications, and establish complexity bounds. We also present an implementation of a special case of robustness, and show experimental results.
193 - 220
Bloem R, Chatterjee K, Greimel K, et al. Synthesizing robust systems. Acta Informatica. 2014;51(3-4):193-220. doi:10.1007/s00236-013-0191-5
Bloem, R., Chatterjee, K., Greimel, K., Henzinger, T. A., Hofferek, G., Jobstmann, B., … Könighofer, R. (2014). Synthesizing robust systems. Acta Informatica, 51(3–4), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00236-013-0191-5
Bloem, Roderick, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Karin Greimel, Thomas A Henzinger, Georg Hofferek, Barbara Jobstmann, Bettina Könighofer, and Robert Könighofer. “Synthesizing Robust Systems.” Acta Informatica 51, no. 3–4 (2014): 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00236-013-0191-5.
R. Bloem et al., “Synthesizing robust systems,” Acta Informatica, vol. 51, no. 3–4, pp. 193–220, 2014.
Bloem R, Chatterjee K, Greimel K, Henzinger TA, Hofferek G, Jobstmann B, Könighofer B, Könighofer R. 2014. Synthesizing robust systems. Acta Informatica. 51(3–4), 193–220.
Bloem, Roderick, et al. “Synthesizing Robust Systems.” Acta Informatica, vol. 51, no. 3–4, Springer, 2014, pp. 193–220, doi:10.1007/s00236-013-0191-5.