@inproceedings{2891, abstract = {Quantitative automata are nondeterministic finite automata with edge weights. They value a run by some function from the sequence of visited weights to the reals, and value a word by its minimal/maximal run. They generalize boolean automata, and have gained much attention in recent years. Unfortunately, important automaton classes, such as sum, discounted-sum, and limit-average automata, cannot be determinized. Yet, the quantitative setting provides the potential of approximate determinization. We define approximate determinization with respect to a distance function, and investigate this potential. We show that sum automata cannot be determinized approximately with respect to any distance function. However, restricting to nonnegative weights allows for approximate determinization with respect to some distance functions. Discounted-sum automata allow for approximate determinization, as the influence of a word’s suffix is decaying. However, the naive approach, of unfolding the automaton computations up to a sufficient level, is shown to be doubly exponential in the discount factor. We provide an alternative construction that is singly exponential in the discount factor, in the precision, and in the number of states. We prove matching lower bounds, showing exponential dependency on each of these three parameters. Average and limit-average automata are shown to prohibit approximate determinization with respect to any distance function, and this is the case even for two weights, 0 and 1.}, author = {Boker, Udi and Henzinger, Thomas A}, booktitle = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics}, location = {Hyderabad, India}, pages = {362 -- 373}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik}, title = {{Approximate determinization of quantitative automata}}, doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.362}, volume = {18}, year = {2012}, } @inproceedings{2890, abstract = {Systems are often specified using multiple requirements on their behavior. In practice, these requirements can be contradictory. The classical approach to specification, verification, and synthesis demands more detailed specifications that resolve any contradictions in the requirements. These detailed specifications are usually large, cumbersome, and hard to maintain or modify. In contrast, quantitative frameworks allow the formalization of the intuitive idea that what is desired is an implementation that comes "closest" to satisfying the mutually incompatible requirements, according to a measure of fit that can be defined by the requirements engineer. One flexible framework for quantifying how "well" an implementation satisfies a specification is offered by simulation distances that are parameterized by an error model. We introduce this framework, study its properties, and provide an algorithmic solution for the following quantitative synthesis question: given two (or more) behavioral requirements specified by possibly incompatible finite-state machines, and an error model, find the finite-state implementation that minimizes the maximal simulation distance to the given requirements. Furthermore, we generalize the framework to handle infinite alphabets (for example, realvalued domains). We also demonstrate how quantitative specifications based on simulation distances might lead to smaller and easier to modify specifications. Finally, we illustrate our approach using case studies on error correcting codes and scheduler synthesis.}, author = {Cerny, Pavol and Gopi, Sivakanth and Henzinger, Thomas A and Radhakrishna, Arjun and Totla, Nishant}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Embedded software}, location = {Tampere, Finland}, pages = {53 -- 62}, publisher = {ACM}, title = {{Synthesis from incompatible specifications}}, doi = {10.1145/2380356.2380371}, year = {2012}, } @inproceedings{2888, abstract = {Formal verification aims to improve the quality of hardware and software by detecting errors before they do harm. At the basis of formal verification lies the logical notion of correctness, which purports to capture whether or not a circuit or program behaves as desired. We suggest that the boolean partition into correct and incorrect systems falls short of the practical need to assess the behavior of hardware and software in a more nuanced fashion against multiple criteria.}, author = {Henzinger, Thomas A}, booktitle = {Conference proceedings MODELS 2012}, location = {Innsbruck, Austria}, pages = {1 -- 2}, publisher = {Springer}, title = {{Quantitative reactive models}}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-33666-9_1}, volume = {7590}, year = {2012}, } @inproceedings{2916, abstract = {The classical (boolean) notion of refinement for behavioral interfaces of system components is the alternating refinement preorder. In this paper, we define a quantitative measure for interfaces, called interface simulation distance. It makes the alternating refinement preorder quantitative by, intu- itively, tolerating errors (while counting them) in the alternating simulation game. We show that the interface simulation distance satisfies the triangle inequality, that the distance between two interfaces does not increase under parallel composition with a third interface, and that the distance between two interfaces can be bounded from above and below by distances between abstractions of the two interfaces. We illustrate the framework, and the properties of the distances under composition of interfaces, with two case studies.}, author = {Cerny, Pavol and Chmelik, Martin and Henzinger, Thomas A and Radhakrishna, Arjun}, booktitle = {Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science}, location = {Napoli, Italy}, pages = {29 -- 42}, publisher = {EPTCS}, title = {{Interface Simulation Distances}}, doi = {10.4204/EPTCS.96.3}, volume = {96}, year = {2012}, } @inproceedings{2936, abstract = {The notion of delays arises naturally in many computational models, such as, in the design of circuits, control systems, and dataflow languages. In this work, we introduce automata with delay blocks (ADBs), extending finite state automata with variable time delay blocks, for deferring individual transition output symbols, in a discrete-time setting. We show that the ADB languages strictly subsume the regular languages, and are incomparable in expressive power to the context-free languages. We show that ADBs are closed under union, concatenation and Kleene star, and under intersection with regular languages, but not closed under complementation and intersection with other ADB languages. We show that the emptiness and the membership problems are decidable in polynomial time for ADBs, whereas the universality problem is undecidable. Finally we consider the linear-time model checking problem, i.e., whether the language of an ADB is contained in a regular language, and show that the model checking problem is PSPACE-complete. Copyright 2012 ACM.}, author = {Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Henzinger, Thomas A and Prabhu, Vinayak}, booktitle = {roceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Embedded software}, location = {Tampere, Finland}, pages = {43 -- 52}, publisher = {ACM}, title = {{Finite automata with time delay blocks}}, doi = {10.1145/2380356.2380370}, year = {2012}, }