@inproceedings{3313,
abstract = {Interpreting an image as a function on a compact sub- set of the Euclidean plane, we get its scale-space by diffu- sion, spreading the image over the entire plane. This gener- ates a 1-parameter family of functions alternatively defined as convolutions with a progressively wider Gaussian ker- nel. We prove that the corresponding 1-parameter family of persistence diagrams have norms that go rapidly to zero as time goes to infinity. This result rationalizes experimental observations about scale-space. We hope this will lead to targeted improvements of related computer vision methods.},
author = {Chen, Chao and Edelsbrunner, Herbert},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision},
location = {Barcelona, Spain},
publisher = {IEEE},
title = {{Diffusion runs low on persistence fast}},
doi = {10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126271},
year = {2011},
}
@inproceedings{3329,
abstract = {We consider the offset-deconstruction problem: Given a polygonal shape Q with n vertices, can it be expressed, up to a tolerance µ in Hausdorff distance, as the Minkowski sum of another polygonal shape P with a disk of fixed radius? If it does, we also seek a preferably simple-looking solution shape P; then, P's offset constitutes an accurate, vertex-reduced, and smoothened approximation of Q. We give an O(n log n)-time exact decision algorithm that handles any polygonal shape, assuming the real-RAM model of computation. An alternative algorithm, based purely on rational arithmetic, answers the same deconstruction problem, up to an uncertainty parameter, and its running time depends on the parameter δ (in addition to the other input parameters: n, δ and the radius of the disk). If the input shape is found to be approximable, the rational-arithmetic algorithm also computes an approximate solution shape for the problem. For convex shapes, the complexity of the exact decision algorithm drops to O(n), which is also the time required to compute a solution shape P with at most one more vertex than a vertex-minimal one. Our study is motivated by applications from two different domains. However, since the offset operation has numerous uses, we anticipate that the reverse question that we study here will be still more broadly applicable. We present results obtained with our implementation of the rational-arithmetic algorithm.},
author = {Berberich, Eric and Halperin, Dan and Kerber, Michael and Pogalnikova, Roza},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual symposium on Computational geometry},
location = {Paris, France},
pages = {187 -- 196},
publisher = {ACM},
title = {{Deconstructing approximate offsets}},
doi = {10.1145/1998196.1998225},
year = {2011},
}
@inproceedings{3330,
abstract = {We consider the problem of approximating all real roots of a square-free polynomial f. Given isolating intervals, our algorithm refines each of them to a width at most 2-L, that is, each of the roots is approximated to L bits after the binary point. Our method provides a certified answer for arbitrary real polynomials, only requiring finite approximations of the polynomial coefficient and choosing a suitable working precision adaptively. In this way, we get a correct algorithm that is simple to implement and practically efficient. Our algorithm uses the quadratic interval refinement method; we adapt that method to be able to cope with inaccuracies when evaluating f, without sacrificing its quadratic convergence behavior. We prove a bound on the bit complexity of our algorithm in terms of degree, coefficient size and discriminant. Our bound improves previous work on integer polynomials by a factor of deg f and essentially matches best known theoretical bounds on root approximation which are obtained by very sophisticated algorithms.},
author = {Kerber, Michael and Sagraloff, Michael},
location = {California, USA},
pages = {209 -- 216},
publisher = {Springer},
title = {{Root refinement for real polynomials}},
doi = {10.1145/1993886.1993920},
year = {2011},
}
@article{3332,
abstract = {Given an algebraic hypersurface O in ℝd, how many simplices are necessary for a simplicial complex isotopic to O? We address this problem and the variant where all vertices of the complex must lie on O. We give asymptotically tight worst-case bounds for algebraic plane curves. Our results gradually improve known bounds in higher dimensions; however, the question for tight bounds remains unsolved for d ≥ 3.},
author = {Kerber, Michael and Sagraloff, Michael},
journal = {Graphs and Combinatorics},
number = {3},
pages = {419 -- 430},
publisher = {Springer},
title = {{A note on the complexity of real algebraic hypersurfaces}},
doi = {10.1007/s00373-011-1020-7},
volume = {27},
year = {2011},
}
@article{3334,
author = {Edelsbrunner, Herbert and Pach, János and Ziegler, Günter},
journal = {Discrete & Computational Geometry},
number = {1},
pages = {1 -- 2},
publisher = {Springer},
title = {{Letter from the new editors-in-chief}},
doi = {10.1007/s00454-010-9313-9},
volume = {45},
year = {2011},
}