@misc{5574, abstract = {Comparison of Scopus' and publisher's data on Austrian publication output at IOP. }, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Data Check IOP Scopus vs. Publisher}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:86}, year = {2018}, } @phdthesis{278, abstract = {Consortial subscription contracts regulate the digital access to publications between publishers and scientific libraries. However, since a couple of years the tendency towards a freely accessible publishing (Open Access) intensifies. As a consequence of this trend the contractual relationship between licensor and licensee is gradually changing as well: More and more contracts exercise influence on open access publishing. The present study attempts to compare Austrian examples of consortial licence contracts, which include components of open access. It describes the difference between pure subscription contracts and differing innovative deals including open access components. Thereby it becomes obvious that for the evaluation of this licence contracts new methods are needed. An essential new element of such analyses is the evaluation of the open access publication numbers. So this study tries to carry out such publication analyses for Austrian open access deals focusing on quantitative questions: How does the number of publications evolve? How does the open access share change? Publications reports of the publishers and database queries from Scopus form the data basis. The analysis of the data points out that differing approaches of contracts result in highly divergent results: Particular deals can prioritize a saving in costs or else the increase of the open access rate. It is to be assumed that within the following years further numerous open access deals will be negotiated. The finding of this study shall provide guidance.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, pages = {94}, publisher = {Universität Wien}, title = {{Lizenzverträge mit Open-Access-Komponenten an österreichischen Bibliotheken}}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5582, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at Taylor&Francis from 2013-2017 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Taylor&Francis Austrian Publications 2013-2017}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:94}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5581, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at Springer from 2013-2016 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Springer Austrian Publications 2013-2016}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:93}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5580, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at SAGE from 2013-2017 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{SAGE Austrian Publications 2013-2017}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:92}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5579, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at RSC from 2013-2017 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{RSC Austrian Publications 2013-2017}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:91}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5576, abstract = {Comparison of Scopus' and FWF's data on Austrian publication output at T&F.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Data Check T&F Scopus vs. FWF}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:88}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5575, abstract = {Comparison of Scopus' and FWF's data on Austrian publication output at RSC. }, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Data Check RSC Scopus vs. FWF}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:87}, year = {2018}, } @techreport{5450, abstract = {In this report the implementation of the institutional data repository IST DataRep at IST Austria will be covered: Starting with the research phase when requirements for a repository were established, the procedure of choosing a repository-software and its customization based on the results of user-testings will be discussed. Followed by reflections on the marketing strategies in regard of impact, and at the end sharing some experiences of one year operating IST DataRep.}, author = {Barbara Petritsch}, publisher = {IST Austria}, title = {{Implementing the institutional data repository IST DataRep}}, year = {2017}, } @article{807, abstract = {On January the 1st, 2016 a new agreement between 32 Austrian scientific libraries and the publisher Springer took its effect: this deal covers accessing the licensed content on the one hand, and publishing open access on the other hand. More than 1000 papers by Austrian authors were published open access at Springer in the first year alone. The working group "Springer Compact Evaluierung" made the data for these articles available via the platform OpenAPC and would like to use this opportunity to give a short account of what this publishing agreement actually entails and the working group intends to do.}, author = {Andrae, Magdalena and Villányi, Márton}, issn = {10222588}, journal = {Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare}, number = {2}, pages = {274 -- 280}, publisher = {VÖB}, title = {{Der Springer Compact-Deal – Ein erster Einblick in die Evaluierung einer Offsetting-Vereinbarung}}, doi = {10.31263/voebm.v70i2.1898}, volume = {70}, year = {2017}, }