@inproceedings{3215, abstract = {Most cryptographic primitives such as encryption, authentication or secret sharing require randomness. Usually one assumes that perfect randomness is available, but those primitives might also be realized under weaker assumptions. In this work we continue the study of building secure cryptographic primitives from imperfect random sources initiated by Dodis and Spencer (FOCS’02). Their main result shows that there exists a (high-entropy) source of randomness allowing for perfect encryption of a bit, and yet from which one cannot extract even a single weakly random bit, separating encryption from extraction. Our main result separates encryption from 2-out-2 secret sharing (both in the information-theoretic and in the computational settings): any source which can be used to achieve one-bit encryption also can be used for 2-out-2 secret sharing of one bit, but the converse is false, even for high-entropy sources. Therefore, possibility of extraction strictly implies encryption, which in turn strictly implies 2-out-2 secret sharing.}, author = {Dodis, Yevgeniy and Krzysztof Pietrzak and Przydatek, Bartosz}, pages = {601 -- 616}, publisher = {Springer}, title = {{Separating sources for encryption and secret sharing}}, doi = {10.1007/11681878_31}, volume = {3876}, year = {2006}, } @inproceedings{3217, abstract = {To prove that a secure key-agreement protocol exists one must at least show P ≠NP. Moreover any proof that the sequential composition of two non-adaptively secure pseudorandom functions is secure against at least two adaptive queries must falsify the decisional Diffie-Hellman assumption, a standard assumption from public-key cryptography. Hence proving any of this two seemingly unrelated statements would require a significant breakthrough. We show that at least one of the two statements is true. To our knowledge this gives the first positive cryptographic result (namely that composition implies some weak adaptive security) which holds in Minicrypt, but not in Cryptomania, i.e. under the assumption that one-way functions exist, but public-key cryptography does not.}, author = {Krzysztof Pietrzak}, pages = {328 -- 338}, publisher = {Springer}, title = {{Composition implies adaptive security in minicrypt}}, doi = {10.1007/11761679_20}, volume = {4004}, year = {2006}, } @inproceedings{3216, abstract = {We prove a new upper bound on the advantage of any adversary for distinguishing the encrypted CBC-MAC (EMAC) based on random permutations from a random function. Our proof uses techniques recently introduced in [BPR05], which again were inspired by [DGH + 04]. The bound we prove is tight — in the sense that it matches the advantage of known attacks up to a constant factor — for a wide range of the parameters: let n denote the block-size, q the number of queries the adversary is allowed to make and ℓ an upper bound on the length (i.e. number of blocks) of the messages, then for ℓ ≤ 2 n/8 and q≥ł2 the advantage is in the order of q 2/2 n (and in particular independent of ℓ). This improves on the previous bound of q 2ℓΘ(1/ln ln ℓ)/2 n from [BPR05] and matches the trivial attack (which thus is basically optimal) where one simply asks random queries until a collision is found.}, author = {Krzysztof Pietrzak}, pages = {168 -- 179}, publisher = {Springer}, title = {{A tight bound for EMAC}}, doi = {10.1007/11787006_15}, volume = {4052}, year = {2006}, } @article{3522, abstract = {We observed sharp wave/ripples (SWR) during exploration within brief (< 2.4 s) interruptions of or during theta oscillations. CA1 network responses of SWRs occurring during exploration (eSWR) and SWRs detected in waking immobility or sleep were similar. However, neuronal activity during eSWR was location dependent, and eSWR-related firing was stronger inside the place field than outside. The eSPW-related firing increase was stronger than the baseline increase inside compared to outside, suggesting a “supralinear” summation of eSWR and place-selective inputs. Pairs of cells with similar place fields and/or correlated firing during exploration showed stronger coactivation during eSWRs and subsequent sleep-SWRs. Sequential activation of place cells was not required for the reactivation of waking co-firing patterns; cell pairs with symmetrical cross-correlations still showed reactivated waking co-firing patterns during sleep-SWRs. We suggest that place-selective firing during eSWRs facilitates initial associations between cells with similar place fields that enable place-related ensemble patterns to recur during subsequent sleep-SWRs.}, author = {Joseph O'Neill and Senior,Timothy and Jozsef Csicsvari}, journal = {Neuron}, number = {1}, pages = {143 -- 155}, publisher = {Elsevier}, title = {{Place-selective firing of CA1 pyramidal cells during sharp wave/ripple network patterns in exploratory behavior}}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.037}, volume = {49}, year = {2006}, } @article{3607, abstract = {We apply new analytical methods to understand the consequences of population bottlenecks for expected additive genetic variance. We analyze essentially all models for multilocus epistasis that have been numerically simulated to demonstrate increased additive variance. We conclude that for biologically plausible models, large increases in expected additive variance–attributable to epistasis rather than dominance–are unlikely. Naciri-Graven and Goudet (2003) found that as the number of epistatically interacting loci increases, additive variance tends to be inflated more after a bottleneck. We argue that this result reflects biologically unrealistic aspects of their models. Specifically, as the number of loci increases, higher-order epistatic interactions become increasingly important in these models, with an increasing fraction of the genetic variance becoming nonadditive, contrary to empirical observations. As shown by Barton and Turelli (2004), without dominance, conversion of nonadditive to additive variance depends only on the variance components and not on the number of loci per se. Numerical results indicating that more inbreeding is needed to produce maximal release of additive variance with more loci follow directly from our analytical results, which show that high levels of inbreeding (F > 0.5) are needed for significant conversion of higher-order components. We discuss alternative approaches to modeling multilocus epistasis and understanding its consequences.}, author = {Turelli, Michael and Nicholas Barton}, journal = {Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution}, number = {9}, pages = {1763 -- 1776}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, title = {{Will population bottlenecks and multilocus epistasis increase additive genetic variance?}}, doi = {10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00521.x}, volume = {60}, year = {2006}, }