@article{14796, abstract = {Key innovations are fundamental to biological diversification, but their genetic basis is poorly understood. A recent transition from egg-laying to live-bearing in marine snails (Littorina spp.) provides the opportunity to study the genetic architecture of an innovation that has evolved repeatedly across animals. Individuals do not cluster by reproductive mode in a genome-wide phylogeny, but local genealogical analysis revealed numerous small genomic regions where all live-bearers carry the same core haplotype. Candidate regions show evidence for live-bearer–specific positive selection and are enriched for genes that are differentially expressed between egg-laying and live-bearing reproductive systems. Ages of selective sweeps suggest that live-bearer–specific alleles accumulated over more than 200,000 generations. Our results suggest that new functions evolve through the recruitment of many alleles rather than in a single evolutionary step.}, author = {Stankowski, Sean and Zagrodzka, Zuzanna B. and Garlovsky, Martin D. and Pal, Arka and Shipilina, Daria and Garcia Castillo, Diego Fernando and Lifchitz, Hila and Le Moan, Alan and Leder, Erica and Reeve, James and Johannesson, Kerstin and Westram, Anja M and Butlin, Roger K.}, issn = {1095-9203}, journal = {Science}, number = {6678}, pages = {114--119}, publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science}, title = {{The genetic basis of a recent transition to live-bearing in marine snails}}, doi = {10.1126/science.adi2982}, volume = {383}, year = {2024}, } @phdthesis{15020, abstract = {This thesis consists of four distinct pieces of work within theoretical biology, with two themes in common: the concept of optimization in biological systems, and the use of information-theoretic tools to quantify biological stochasticity and statistical uncertainty. Chapter 2 develops a statistical framework for studying biological systems which we believe to be optimized for a particular utility function, such as retinal neurons conveying information about visual stimuli. We formalize such beliefs as maximum-entropy Bayesian priors, constrained by the expected utility. We explore how such priors aid inference of system parameters with limited data and enable optimality hypothesis testing: is the utility higher than by chance? Chapter 3 examines the ultimate biological optimization process: evolution by natural selection. As some individuals survive and reproduce more successfully than others, populations evolve towards fitter genotypes and phenotypes. We formalize this as accumulation of genetic information, and use population genetics theory to study how much such information can be accumulated per generation and maintained in the face of random mutation and genetic drift. We identify the population size and fitness variance as the key quantities that control information accumulation and maintenance. Chapter 4 reuses the concept of genetic information from Chapter 3, but from a different perspective: we ask how much genetic information organisms actually need, in particular in the context of gene regulation. For example, how much information is needed to bind transcription factors at correct locations within the genome? Population genetics provides us with a refined answer: with an increasing population size, populations achieve higher fitness by maintaining more genetic information. Moreover, regulatory parameters experience selection pressure to optimize the fitness-information trade-off, i.e. minimize the information needed for a given fitness. This provides an evolutionary derivation of the optimization priors introduced in Chapter 2. Chapter 5 proves an upper bound on mutual information between a signal and a communication channel output (such as neural activity). Mutual information is an important utility measure for biological systems, but its practical use can be difficult due to the large dimensionality of many biological channels. Sometimes, a lower bound on mutual information is computed by replacing the high-dimensional channel outputs with decodes (signal estimates). Our result provides a corresponding upper bound, provided that the decodes are the maximum posterior estimates of the signal.}, author = {Hledik, Michal}, issn = {2663 - 337X}, keywords = {Theoretical biology, Optimality, Evolution, Information}, pages = {158}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Genetic information and biological optimization}}, doi = {10.15479/at:ista:15020}, year = {2024}, } @misc{14842, abstract = {Eva Benkova received a PhD in Biophysics at the Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences in 1998. After working as a postdoc at the Max Planck Institute in Cologne and the Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP) in Tübingen, she became a group leader at the Plant Systems Biology Department of the Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB) in Gent. In 2012, she transitioned to an Assistant Professor position at the Institute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA) where she was later promoted to Professor. Since 2021, she has served as the Dean of the ISTA Graduate School. As a plant developmental biologist, she focuses on unraveling the molecular mechanisms and principles that underlie hormonal interactions in plants. In her current work, she explores the intricate connections between hormones and regulatory pathways that mediate the perception of environmental stimuli, including abiotic stress and nitrate availability.}, author = {Benková, Eva}, booktitle = {Current Biology}, issn = {1879-0445}, number = {1}, pages = {R3--R5}, publisher = {Elsevier}, title = {{Eva Benkova}}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2023.11.039}, volume = {34}, year = {2024}, } @article{15084, abstract = {GABAB receptor (GBR) activation inhibits neurotransmitter release in axon terminals in the brain, except in medial habenula (MHb) terminals, which show robust potentiation. However, mechanisms underlying this enigmatic potentiation remain elusive. Here, we report that GBR activation on MHb terminals induces an activity-dependent transition from a facilitating, tonic to a depressing, phasic neurotransmitter release mode. This transition is accompanied by a 4.1-fold increase in readily releasable vesicle pool (RRP) size and a 3.5-fold increase of docked synaptic vesicles (SVs) at the presynaptic active zone (AZ). Strikingly, the depressing phasic release exhibits looser coupling distance than the tonic release. Furthermore, the tonic and phasic release are selectively affected by deletion of synaptoporin (SPO) and Ca 2+ -dependent activator protein for secretion 2 (CAPS2), respectively. SPO modulates augmentation, the short-term plasticity associated with tonic release, and CAPS2 retains the increased RRP for initial responses in phasic response trains. The cytosolic protein CAPS2 showed a SV-associated distribution similar to the vesicular transmembrane protein SPO, and they were colocalized in the same terminals. We developed the “Flash and Freeze-fracture” method, and revealed the release of SPO-associated vesicles in both tonic and phasic modes and activity-dependent recruitment of CAPS2 to the AZ during phasic release, which lasted several minutes. Overall, these results indicate that GBR activation translocates CAPS2 to the AZ along with the fusion of CAPS2-associated SVs, contributing to persistency of the RRP increase. Thus, we identified structural and molecular mechanisms underlying tonic and phasic neurotransmitter release and their transition by GBR activation in MHb terminals.}, author = {Koppensteiner, Peter and Bhandari, Pradeep and Önal, Hüseyin C and Borges Merjane, Carolina and Le Monnier, Elodie and Roy, Utsa and Nakamura, Yukihiro and Sadakata, Tetsushi and Sanbo, Makoto and Hirabayashi, Masumi and Rhee, JeongSeop and Brose, Nils and Jonas, Peter M and Shigemoto, Ryuichi}, issn = {1091-6490}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, number = {8}, publisher = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, title = {{GABAB receptors induce phasic release from medial habenula terminals through activity-dependent recruitment of release-ready vesicles}}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2301449121}, volume = {121}, year = {2024}, } @article{15083, abstract = {Direct reciprocity is a powerful mechanism for cooperation in social dilemmas. The very logic of reciprocity, however, seems to require that individuals are symmetric, and that everyone has the same means to influence each others’ payoffs. Yet in many applications, individuals are asymmetric. Herein, we study the effect of asymmetry in linear public good games. Individuals may differ in their endowments (their ability to contribute to a public good) and in their productivities (how effective their contributions are). Given the individuals’ productivities, we ask which allocation of endowments is optimal for cooperation. To this end, we consider two notions of optimality. The first notion focuses on the resilience of cooperation. The respective endowment distribution ensures that full cooperation is feasible even under the most adverse conditions. The second notion focuses on efficiency. The corresponding endowment distribution maximizes group welfare. Using analytical methods, we fully characterize these two endowment distributions. This analysis reveals that both optimality notions favor some endowment inequality: More productive players ought to get higher endowments. Yet the two notions disagree on how unequal endowments are supposed to be. A focus on resilience results in less inequality. With additional simulations, we show that the optimal endowment allocation needs to account for both the resilience and the efficiency of cooperation.}, author = {Hübner, Valentin and Staab, Manuel and Hilbe, Christian and Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Kleshnina, Maria}, issn = {1091-6490}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, number = {10}, publisher = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, title = {{Efficiency and resilience of cooperation in asymmetric social dilemmas}}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2315558121}, volume = {121}, year = {2024}, }